dzt,
Thank you for the explanation, I thought I was going bonkers as it was not what I expected to be the case.
But having a common denominator is a good thing in some cases.
This has been fun. I guess it's what keeps me playing with computers long past my retirement. But over a 45 year career, I always enjoyed learning a new system or language.
I did notice that policing of what is and is not supported isn't all that good in either .NET or #develop.
For example, System.Threading.Mutex defines that creating a named Mutex in .Net CF isn't supported, yet if I target Net CF 2.0 (only one I tried), it compiles with no issue. I realize that the doc on MSDN maybe wrong, but either way it makes it a bit of a guessing game.
Have you had this experience?
Regards,
Jim
|