FormExDesktop v2.0 for Basic4ppc v6.90

[agraham]

My, what a chip we seem to have on our shoulder about something.

By the way, about my intellectual property I have no need to consult Erel about anything. Good-bye.

[Sir Isaac]

Originally Posted by agraham

My, what a chip we seem to have on our shoulder about something.

By the way, about my intellectual property I have no need to consult Erel about anything. Good-bye.

Such cheeky answers is a clear token of fraud to me. Probably, you'd better tell my lawyer about that chip. And now just remind me since what time did standard Windows Form properties, methods, and events become "your intellectual property", Dr Agraham? And why should I pay twice (to 2 independent developers) for having a normal access to them in one commercial programming language?

[Erel]

I think that you are confused.
Agraham (like all other developers) is completely entitled to develop commercial libraries.

If you are not satisfied with the library or its license then you should not use it.

And why should I pay twice (to 2 independent developers) for having a normal access to them in one commercial programming language?

This is not relevant. Agraham is not affiliated with Anywhere Software.
You should point this question to me.

Note that we offer full money back guarantee for 30 days.

[Erel]

I've deleted the last post. This discussion has been exhausted.

[taximania]

Originally Posted by Sir Isaac

Such cheeky answers is a clear token of fraud to me. Probably, you'd better tell my lawyer about that chip. And now just remind me since what time did standard Windows Form properties, methods, and events become "your intellectual property", Dr Agraham? And why should I pay twice (to 2 independent developers) for having a normal access to them in one commercial programming language?

I too have supplied libraries to this forum.
These are available to registered members, people who bought the software.
If I put a disclaimer in my libraries asking they not be used in commercial products, then that is my choice. I wrote the library, my creation.
The publication of that library on this forum is part proof of my copyright over it. If I decide to allow users to use it in commercial apps, at a price, that is my choice.

I'm disgusted at Isaac's posts to agraham on this thread.
agraham has been 'the' major contributer on this forum along side Erel since it's creation. His time, effort and dedication to B4PPC alone deserve him respect of huge proportions !!
How someone can come on here after 21 posts and spout such cr** is beyond me.

'My lawyer', 'fraud', 'paying twice', get a life mate.
I've dealt with bigger lawyers than yours over copyright stuff, believe me.
If they can claim intelectual copyright, so can we.

The product you bought doesn't have certain capabilities.
Using 2nd party products it does. As long as you are prepared to follow the 2nd party T&C's

Please don't delete this post Erel, I'd like other members to read it and get a reality check.
Members create libraries in their own time, their own effort, just to give a greater use of your software to others.

[lqg2118]

Originally Posted by agraham

I am not entirely sure of the point of your post but notice the name - Basic For Pocket PC. Erel's target was always the Compact Framework on Pocket PC and Windows Mobile devices. Erel provided a desktop interpreter for development and the fact that owing, to the retargetable capability of Compact Framework applications, those applications could run on the desktop under the full Framework was a bonus.

Desktop applications were never a target for Basic4ppc but it so happens that with some suitable tweaking to expose more desktop functionality it happens to work quite well. I don't believe that Erel intends any further development of Basic4ppc as it is not a commercial proposition for him (and he's pretty busy as well!) so I don't think it will "move deskwards" any further (except for my own private copy ).

if your had developed a good private copy,share it with me,haha!