I could say I agree with general idea of a minimal answer should be given, but, as stated, the question forum takes a lot more relevance and time. This said, I know for a fact that all request are read and thought about... but it is not just because "it shouldn't be too hard to implement" that a wish will be implemented... EREL has to weight out the benefits it may bring for the general users... I recently made a request to EREL that was implemented in only a few days time (from request to implementation) but it was a really simple one, transparent for about 99% of the users.... so why it was implemented? EREL has for sure his reasons... Many other feature requests have been implemented, like the custom view custom properties, which took 3 b4a versions before being implemented...
What I'm trying to say is... not every wish/request will be implemented, but also, not every wish/request deserve an answer, like "I've like to have better support for my one of the kind android thing"...(I made this one up!)...
Reasonable requests should have an answer... positive or negative... even a negative for now, maybe positive later...
But do remember, EREL is not a three headed alien, nor has cloned himself dozens... And still, he manages to give us amazing products and upgrades at an incredible rate!